Family Tree
Church register

Rayleigh, Holy Trinity, Essex: parish registers

Rayleigh, Holy Trinity, Essex: parish registers · Church of England · Rayleigh, Essex, England

Parish / congregation
Rayleigh
Denomination
Church of England
Place
Rayleigh, Essex, England
Register type
mixed
Provider
other
Form accessed
transcript

Volunteer transcript of the Rayleigh parish register, read at https://www.freereg.org.uk/ on 2026-09-07. Individual entries are addressed as https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_records/<id>, and their full field set as that URL plus /show_print_version.json. No URL is set on this source row because the site's single search address already identifies several other FreeREG parish sources in this tree.

Cited by

Rayleigh, Holy Trinity, Essex: parish registers Marriages, 14 January 1802 Primary

Rayleigh, Holy Trinity, Essex: parish registers · Church of England · Rayleigh, Essex, England

For William Finch & Mercy Walker

County Essex | Place Rayleigh | Church name Holy Trinity | Register type Parish Register | Marriage date 14 Jan 1802 | Groom forename William | Groom surname FINCH | Groom parish Rayleigh | Groom condition widower | Bride forename Mercy | Bride surname WALKER | Bride parish Rayleigh | Bride condition spinster | Witness1 James PEARSON | Witness2 Judith PEARSON | Transcribed by David Shipton | Credit David Shipton | File line number 325

The FreeREG record page's own field labels and values, in its order. The earlier transcription of this citation quoted only one witness; the register names two, James PEARSON and Judith PEARSON. It is the only Finch marriage at Rayleigh between 1780 and 1830 involving a Mercy, and it is the source of the surname WALKER, which the passenger list does not give. A full sweep of the FreeREG transcript of Rayleigh Holy Trinity on 2026-09-08 adds three checked negatives, each with a working control. (a) There is no baptism there for Samuel, son of a William and a Mercy: the register is densely transcribed for those years — seventeen Finch baptisms 1790-1835, including a Samuel Finch baptised 2 February 1806 to a different Samuel and Susannah, who married at Rayleigh on 11 June 1805 — so the absence is real and not a gap. Samuel's christening entry on FamilySearch carries a date of birth as well as a date of christening, which is the signature of a non-parochial (dissenting) register rather than an Anglican one, and a non-parochial index entry for him has been seen; the chapel register, not this one, is where his baptism and his brothers and sisters will be. (b) There is no Finch marriage at Rayleigh before this one: the marriage register is transcribed back well past 1750 (control: sixteen Smith marriages there 1750-1802), so William's first marriage, which made him a widower in January 1802, took place in another parish. (c) There is no Walker baptism at Rayleigh between 1661 and 1800 — the whole transcribed Walker set runs 1629-1807 and its only nineteenth-century entries are two children of a Thomas Walker and Elizabeth, 1800 and 1807 — so Mercy was of Rayleigh by residence when the banns were called, and was baptised elsewhere. No William or Mercy Finch burial appears at Rayleigh 1800-1860 either (nine Finch burials are transcribed for that window, each with an age and an abode).

Rayleigh, Holy Trinity, Essex: parish registers Marriages, 14 January 1802 Primary

Rayleigh, Holy Trinity, Essex: parish registers · Church of England · Rayleigh, Essex, England

For Samuel Finch (1806–1886)

church_name: Holy Trinity | register_type: Parish Register | marriage_date: 14 Jan 1802 | groom_forename: William | groom_surname: FINCH | groom_parish: Rayleigh | groom_condition: widower | bride_forename: Mercy | bride_surname: WALKER | bride_parish: Rayleigh | bride_condition: spinster | witness: Judith PEARSON

The FreeREG transcript's own field names and values. This is the marriage of the William Finch and Mercy Walker whom the Australian Cemeteries Index names as Samuel's parents, in the parish it names as his birthplace, four years before his stated birth. It corroborates that the couple existed at Rayleigh; it does NOT prove Samuel was their son, and no baptism for him has been found — the Rayleigh Finch baptisms 1795-1830 on FreeREG contain no child of a William and Mercy. William Finch and Mercy Walker are therefore NOT proposed as tree rows.