Family Tree
Compiled tree

WikiTree profile: Joseph Hammer (Hammer-1124)

Provider
WikiTree
Tree id
Hammer-1124

Backup source only.

Cited by

WikiTree profile: Joseph Hammer (Hammer-1124) WikiTree profile Hammer-1113 (William Hammer) Questionable

For William Hammer (1846–1896)

FirstName: William | BirthDate: 1846-00-00 | DeathDate: 1896-11-02 | BirthLocation: St Austell, Cornwall, England, United Kingdom | DeathLocation: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia | Father: Hammer-1117 (Richard) | Mother: Tonkin-550 (Maria)

Fetched via WikiTree's public API (api.wikitree.com getProfile) this session. Same backup tree (Hammer-1124/Hammer-1117) already cited on this man's parents Richard Hammer #81313 and Maria Tonkin #81314. Sharpens the year-only death date already on this record to the day, and fills the previously-null birth/death places with places already in the tree (#336, #836).

WikiTree profile: Joseph Hammer (Hammer-1124) Questionable

For Lavinia Jane Hammer (1874–1875)

SELF: Lavinia Jane Hammer | BirthDate: 1874-06-21 | BirthLocation: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia | DeathDate: 1875-02-14 | DeathLocation: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia | Parent: Phillip Henry Hammer (Hammer-1245) | Parent: Elizabeth Jane Luke (Luke-1008)

Fetched this session via WikiTree's public API (api.wikitree.com getProfile) on profile Hammer-1217, cross-checked against parent profile Hammer-1245 (= Phillip Henry Hammer #81373 already in the tree, married Elizabeth Jane Luke #81374, family 32451) whose vitals match exactly. Same backup Hammer WikiTree source already cited elsewhere in this project (e.g. citation #50354 on #81373 itself). Family 32451's existing citation (#50407, source #1574) already asserted Phillip Henry Hammer x Elizabeth Jane Luke were 'Father of 11 children' and Hammer-1245's own bio lists all 11 by name including Lavinia Jane Hammer (1874-1875) second in birth order, linking only Philip Henry Hammer b.1876 (#81375) so far. Exact given names, exact birth and death dates and Ballarat location match disconnected person #81702 with no remaining ambiguity against a compiled-tree source. A primary Victorian BDM confirmation is still worth chasing (flagged for Chrome) to upgrade this from quality 1.